The Times online reports that UK Government ministers have agreed in principle to spend £12 billion to enable GCHQ to monitor every phone call , every email and all our browsing habits.
If true, this must be unprecedented in peace-time, and exceeds even the East German Stasi in its level of monitoring the population. It’s an extremely worrying development, particularly given the draconian powers HMG have pushed through in recent years. We are presently living in a State where merely reading material deemed inappropriate can result in prosecution.
What happened to the presumption that we are innocent until proven guilty?
We are already the most monitored population in the world: check out the Open Rights Group web page, and this in particular. It turns out the ORG have been aware of and discussed this business for some time.
This story makes the Phorm phiasco seem like child’s play, and perhaps explains why HMG and its quangos won’t do anything about it.
Related stories indicate ID cards will be rolled out from November; and report on GCHQs proposals. It is time we had a written constitution that protectsthe population from abuses of power.
Edit: this move to data interception may be the UK part of European Directive 2006/24/EC
5th October 2008 at 3:26 pm
Governments – even putative liberal democratic ones such as ours – have long since ben using conflict and war as a pretence on which to erode liberty. This was certainly true after WW1 and WW2 (see, for example, the introduction of my book Conflict and Legality).
There are already sweeping powers in place with no accountability to the population and I rather think that what the giovernment are after is really little more than a formalisation of existig informal practices.
7th October 2008 at 8:35 am
As far as I can see, we are facing the following scenario:
1. HMG using terror threats to scare the population
2. The fear instilled in the population feeds on intolerance of minorities and racism
3. The fear will persuade the public to accept moves from HMG to intrude on our privacy and civil rights
4. The EU directive covers collection of headers etc, to record who we communicate with, not the content
5. HMG will over-interpret the directive to collect content of communication. And probably leave it on a commuter train, such is their lax approach to data security.