Comments on: Intelligent Design is not science, and should not be taught in science lessons http://robertsaunders.org.uk/wordpress/2009/12/01/intelligent-design-is-not-science-and-should-not-be-taught-in-science-lessons/ ...biology and atheism in an overly religious world... Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:25:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: GrumpyBob http://robertsaunders.org.uk/wordpress/2009/12/01/intelligent-design-is-not-science-and-should-not-be-taught-in-science-lessons/comment-page-1/#comment-1008 GrumpyBob Sat, 03 Apr 2010 05:06:30 +0000 http://www.robertsaunders.org.uk/wordpress/2009/12/01/intelligent-design-is-not-science-and-should-not-be-taught-in-science-lessons/#comment-1008 Ron, stop plugging your book - one plug is enough. Ron, stop plugging your book – one plug is enough.

]]> By: Ron Krumpos http://robertsaunders.org.uk/wordpress/2009/12/01/intelligent-design-is-not-science-and-should-not-be-taught-in-science-lessons/comment-page-1/#comment-1000 Ron Krumpos Tue, 23 Mar 2010 21:35:32 +0000 http://www.robertsaunders.org.uk/wordpress/2009/12/01/intelligent-design-is-not-science-and-should-not-be-taught-in-science-lessons/#comment-1000 There are four excellent books related to this topic, written by 20th and 21st Century scientists who are also deeply religious. Intelligent design need not mean creationism; evolution need not mean lack of intelligence. "The Language of God," by Francis S. Collins (Free Press/Simon & Schuster 2006). Dr Collins was head-Human Genome Project. He believes that faith in God and science can co-exist and be harmonious. "Let There be Light," by Howard Smith (New World Library 2006). Dr. Smith is a senior astrophysicist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center. He explains how modern study of the cosmos complements the Kabbalah. "Intelligence in Nature," by Jeremy Narby (Jeremy P. Thatcher/Penguin 2005). Dr. Narby has a doctorate in anthropology. He makes a reasoned connection between shamanistic beliefs and modern science. “Quantum Questions / Mystical Writings of the World’s Greatest Physicists” (Shambala Publications 2001), edited by Ken Wilber. This book includes lengthy essays by Heisenberg, Schroedinger, de Broglie, Jeans, Planck, Pauli, and Eddington. These books, among others on psychology, psychiatry, biology, neurology, physics, and astronomy, were helpful in preparing my e-book at <a href="http://www.suprarational.org" target="_blank">http://www.suprarational.org</a> and balanced the input of the five major religions and their mystics. There are four excellent books related to this topic, written by 20th and 21st Century scientists who are also deeply religious. Intelligent design need not mean creationism; evolution need not mean lack of intelligence.

"The Language of God," by Francis S. Collins (Free Press/Simon & Schuster 2006). Dr Collins was head-Human Genome Project. He believes that faith in God and science can co-exist and be harmonious.

"Let There be Light," by Howard Smith (New World Library 2006). Dr. Smith is a senior astrophysicist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center. He explains how modern study of the cosmos complements the Kabbalah.

"Intelligence in Nature," by Jeremy Narby (Jeremy P. Thatcher/Penguin 2005). Dr. Narby has a doctorate in anthropology. He makes a reasoned connection between shamanistic beliefs and modern science.

“Quantum Questions / Mystical Writings of the World’s Greatest Physicists” (Shambala Publications 2001), edited by Ken Wilber. This book includes lengthy essays by Heisenberg, Schroedinger, de Broglie, Jeans, Planck, Pauli, and Eddington.

These books, among others on psychology, psychiatry, biology, neurology, physics, and astronomy, were helpful in preparing my e-book at http://www.suprarational.org and balanced the input of the five major religions and their mystics.

]]> By: GrumpyBob http://robertsaunders.org.uk/wordpress/2009/12/01/intelligent-design-is-not-science-and-should-not-be-taught-in-science-lessons/comment-page-1/#comment-774 GrumpyBob Fri, 04 Dec 2009 05:23:55 +0000 http://www.robertsaunders.org.uk/wordpress/2009/12/01/intelligent-design-is-not-science-and-should-not-be-taught-in-science-lessons/#comment-774 More about Alastair Noble here <a href="http://tinyurl.com/yef4c2z" target="_blank">http://tinyurl.com/yef4c2z</a> Wonder if his doctorate is in chemistry or religion? More about Alastair Noble here http://tinyurl.com/yef4c2z
Wonder if his doctorate is in chemistry or religion?

]]> By: Scienz teeching » Why Dont You Blog? http://robertsaunders.org.uk/wordpress/2009/12/01/intelligent-design-is-not-science-and-should-not-be-taught-in-science-lessons/comment-page-1/#comment-769 Scienz teeching » Why Dont You Blog? Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:59:06 +0000 http://www.robertsaunders.org.uk/wordpress/2009/12/01/intelligent-design-is-not-science-and-should-not-be-taught-in-science-lessons/#comment-769 [...] better than I have, and indeed, having done so in a rather more timely fashion. evilburnee.co.uk Wonderful life Richard Dawkins, [...] [...] better than I have, and indeed, having done so in a rather more timely fashion. evilburnee.co.uk Wonderful life Richard Dawkins, [...]

]]> By: GrumpyBob http://robertsaunders.org.uk/wordpress/2009/12/01/intelligent-design-is-not-science-and-should-not-be-taught-in-science-lessons/comment-page-1/#comment-766 GrumpyBob Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:35:43 +0000 http://www.robertsaunders.org.uk/wordpress/2009/12/01/intelligent-design-is-not-science-and-should-not-be-taught-in-science-lessons/#comment-766 I did leave a brief comment over at The Guardian pointing out Noble is a lay preacher (which he conveniently omitted from his article. It's also notable that many of the "scientifically qualified" ID supporters are not biologists. First time I've been described as eloquent! I did leave a brief comment over at The Guardian pointing out Noble is a lay preacher (which he conveniently omitted from his article. It's also notable that many of the "scientifically qualified" ID supporters are not biologists.

First time I've been described as eloquent!

]]> By: Brendan http://robertsaunders.org.uk/wordpress/2009/12/01/intelligent-design-is-not-science-and-should-not-be-taught-in-science-lessons/comment-page-1/#comment-765 Brendan Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:28:29 +0000 http://www.robertsaunders.org.uk/wordpress/2009/12/01/intelligent-design-is-not-science-and-should-not-be-taught-in-science-lessons/#comment-765 Bravo!!!! I just read Noble's piece in the Guardian and was, frankly, appalled. A quick look online dug this post up, and it expresses exactly my sentiments but much more eloquently than I could have done. Regards Brendan Bravo!!!!

I just read Noble's piece in the Guardian and was, frankly, appalled. A quick look online dug this post up, and it expresses exactly my sentiments but much more eloquently than I could have done.

Regards
Brendan

]]>